its not about being popular
its about hits..."Singing With Angels"
I heard your voice A CRYING IN THE CHAPLE..late ONE night
I heard you sayING..IN MY HEART. are you lonesome tonight
I HEAR you crying in the chapel At night AND ALL BECOMES light
im not made of wood..AND I DONT HAVE A WOODEN ART..Love me tender and treat me nice
YOU WERNT NUTHIN BUT THE HOUND DOG...THE Lonely boy WHO got the G.I.MOODY Blues
That's allright mama's watching over you..AND DONT CRY MOMMA
Wise men say if you don't be cruel..im nobodies child
You'll get to heaven wearing blue suede shoes
I was slowly passing an orphan's home one day.
And stopped there for a moment just to watch the children play.
Alone a boy was standing and when I asked him why
he turned with eyes that could not see and he began to cry.
People come for children and take them for their own.
But they all seem to pass me by and I am left alone.
I know they'd like to take me but when they see I'm blind
they always take some other child and I am left behind.
(No) mother's arms to hold me or soothe me when I cry.
Sometimes it gets so lonely I wish that I could die.
I'd walk the streets of heaven where all the blind can see.
And just like all the other kids there'd be a home for me.
R E F R A I N :
I'm nobody's child
I'm nobody's child
I'm like a flower just growing wild.
No mommy's kisses and no daddy's smile
nobody wants me
I'm nobody's child.
[Chorus]
Singing with YO angels, safe in God's HOLY GRACE land
Singing with angels,..walking hand in hand..IN OUR FATHERS WONDERLAND
Singing with angels, it's part of God's master plan
There's so many angels walking ..THA Band in hand
What a beautiful MASTER PLAN..THE grace..the hand,,the band..then thy promise homeland
I got a woman mean as she coud be..she's my happiness
once i can set her free..Don't leave me in my loneliness
Heartbreak hotel since my baby left you..I was counting on you
Thought I had a lot OF LOVE..BUT LOVER i got a more of living to do
The blue moon..of Kentucky shines..upon our suspicious minds
Burning burning hunk a love love makes WONDERING minds
thats alright momma..Mystery trains heading for the light
Gracelands star as our mercyfull grace..keeps on burning bright
[Chorus]
put your head on my shoulder
HAVE OUR HEARTS GOT COLDER
OR THE LINES JUST GOT OLDER
OR THE MOTHER BEGOTTEN BOLDER
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxxK_KETUOA&list=PL808A216F00C562EF
[repeat x3]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWg2vLEyRZc http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xl79l6ro2VA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8ZB6c57ZeA
Elvis has left the building
youtube is a disapointment...so much deleted wORK EFFORT.
'From time to time you’ll be called on to provide some sort of evidence to support your opinions...This is why the internet invented Google.''
and is why the google search function has been peverted
those who dont want you to be foubnd..or find anything
simply get shunted to the 101 st page..[beyond google search finding it]
quote''
Once you’ve decided on your opinion,
use Google to back up your claims with authoritative research.''lol
the internet is full of delusion as well as a few facts
by putting up links you make it easy to get rid of the good ones
and ensure only the bad ones are left to be found
it also ensure's
your topic wont be able to be found
*if they want to keep it hidden
[you tube USED to be great..but now its only by subscription or search]..
i used to get a lot of hits on youtube
now thats gone..such is the way of things that work
others need them to not work
and by stuffing arround with google search
they fixed the game..you now can only be found..by link
thats when the link works..or isnt redirected
but its true..quote''Before you begin you’ll need to decide whose team you’re on...[with us or against us]..Readers [censores]..expect you to be clear about this.
If you’re blogging about politics you shouldn’t confuse them by making overly fine distinctions. Left or right. You choose.
lol dont walk in the middle
it confuses the ones who are there
to classify you a danger or a fool...who shall either ridiclue or censor
still
it was an interesting read
http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=11564&page=0
be affective
forget being popular...lol
if your not contradicting..your a stooge..[a yes maam]
How to be a popular blogger
By Dr Troppo - posted Wednesday, 2 February 2011 Sign Up for free e-mail updates!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By now you’ve probably heard about social media and how it’s making celebrities out of mild mannered public servants and chirpy journalists who think in 140 character bursts. Maybe you’re wondering whether a witty and intelligent person like yourself could also become an internet celebrity. The good news is YOU CAN!
Here’s what you’ll need:
Advertisement
1. Topical issues
2. Keen sense of moral outrage
3. Confidence
4. Stereotypes
5. Wit
6. Google
Advertisement
Pick a side
Before you begin you’ll need to decide whose team you’re on. Readers expect you to be clear about this. If you’re blogging about politics you shouldn’t confuse them by making overly fine distinctions. Left or right. You choose.
Stay on top of the news
Pick your topics carefully. You need to find stories that everybody’s talking about you’ll need to find them just a little bit ahead of everyone else. Good stories include terrorist attacks, natural disasters, toxic spills, elections and gaffes by politicians or celebrities.
Get outraged
When something bad happens you need to be outraged (interested or mildly concerned just isn’t good enough). Good targets for outrage include politicians, foreign leaders, people smugglers, multinational corporations, bankers, lawyers, greenies, the mainstream media and do-gooding celebrities. If you can’t hold them directly responsible for what happened (eg a tsunami or earthquake), you can at least criticise them for saying something stupid or making the problem worse (eg a politician or celebrity taking up space on aircraft that could be carrying relief supplies).
Be consistent
Make sure your readers know in advance who the targets of your outrage will be. Pick a small number of people or organisations that you can get angry at every day. For example, Tony Abbott, Obama, Bono, the United Nations or the mainstream media (which we all know is run by left wing intellectuals/the conservative establishment/greedy corporations). Once you’ve chosen your targets be consistent. Just as James Bond fans don’t want to see him seducing other blokes in his new movie, your readers don’t want to suddenly see you batting for the other side.
Have an opinion
When you express an opinion don’t hem and haw. Don’t say "it’s possible that the government’s changes to asylum seeker policy may have encouraged an increase in the number of boats" say "Julia Gillard has blood on her hands …".
Use stereotypes as shorthand
Remember, your readers don’t have time for new ideas. Most of them are dipping into your blog as a way of avoiding work. You have 23 seconds to get their attention and make your point. To help them you should activate their favourite stereotypes. Depending on your audience these could be guilt-ridden greenies who live in inner city terrace houses, cashed up bogans who drive four wheel drives and live in outer suburban McMansions, lonely middle aged tea partiers who keep pictures of Sarah Palin under their bed, or left wing intellectuals who resent the fact that the dumb kids they went to school with now earn more money than they do.
Be entertaining
Put yourself in your readers place. If you were surfing the web to procrastinate form work, you wouldn’t want to read someone’s PhD thesis would you? If a blog post forces you to think, then it’s not doing its job. As a blogger your mission is to distract, annoy, outrage and entertain. If you can, be witty. Most people who work at a desk don’t find their job amusing.
Learn how to use Google
From time to time you’ll be called on to provide some sort of evidence to support your opinions. This is why the internet invented Google. Once you’ve decided on your opinion, use Google to back up your claims with authoritative research. Remember, neither you or your readers are idiots. So there’s bound to be a study out there that reaches the correct conclusion. If there isn’t don’t worry too much. You’ll just need to explain why all the researchers are biased (eg all medical research is funded by drug companies, climate researchers are all half-witted socialists).
Work hard
Of course to be successful you’ll need to work hard. You want to be the procrastinating office worker’s first port of call and that means having something fresh for them to read every time they sit back with a cup of coffee. So if you can’t think about something outrageous to say, link to someone who does. Linking to other like-minded bloggers will encourage them to link back to you. And remember, some of your readers will be using RSS feeds. That means you have to grab their attention with the title of your post and, at most, the first line of text.
Good luck
Any witty, intelligent person who follows my advice can become a popular blogger. If you try and it doesn’t work, don’t blame me — read the previous sentence again.
Sunday, February 6, 2011
Thursday, January 6, 2011
global cabal...a warming warning
recall the we-pens of mass destraction
love the pr spin machine
It's Time to Bow
to the Flying Global Warming Monster
CLIMATEGATE...mate..
And while the self-proclaimed saviors of the ecosystem take the limo from the jet to their latest eco-conference, the ordinary citizen is called on the carpet for spending an extra minute in the shower....how about free ligh bulbs..or free solar cells on ya roof..great in the day...but ya run on coal at night..
But no amount of tips is ever enough.
Because there is no such thing as a green lifestyle. Trying to do things the "Green" way usually ends up being worse for the environment. From ethanol to reusable bags to organic food, everything you do only makes the planet sicker.
...
Global Warming is not science, it's six-tenths greed and four-tenths ideological fanaticism angled against the unlimited potential of humanity. Some will grow rich off it. Most will be impoverished.
Like most cults only a privileged few are allowed at the top.
Yes, Virginia, you do have to produce those 'Global Warming' documents
In response to a previous FOIA request, U.Va. denied these records existed. However, during Cuccinelli's pre-investigation under the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act ("FATA"), a 2007 law passed unanimously by Virginia's legislature, which clearly covers the work of taxpayer-funded academics, U.Va. stunningly dropped this stance. For this reversal, the taxpayers of Virginia owe Cuccinelli a debt of gratitude.
Still, the school has spent upward of half a million dollars to date fighting Cuccinelli's pursuit, now before the Virginia Supreme Court. However, Virginia's transparency statute FOIA gives the school one week to produce the documents, and offers no exemption for claims U.Va. is using to block Cuccinelli's inquiry.
Webmaster's Commentary:
One of the bright stars of the global warming cult
may turn out to be a crook!
End Democracy To Save Planet Says IPCC
By: Saladin
Prof. Shearman’s book makes no attempt to hide it’s fascist ideals. The introduction reads:
In short, Shearman and Smith argue that liberal democracy – considered sacrosanct in modern societies – is an impediment to finding ecologically sustainable solutions for the planet.
In other words they think we need fascism to save the planet.
Shearman and his co-author Gary Sauer-Thompson, in ‘Green or Gone’ propose the formation of an ‘elite warrior leadership’ to force the people to change their lifestyles.
Are huge northeast snow storms due to global warming?
There are several ways to describe the relation between winter temperature and snowfall….
* Colder winters are three times more likely to be snowier than the median.
* Snowy winters are three times more likely to be cold.
* Warm winters are three times more likely to have less snow than the median.
* Less snowy winters are three times more likely to be mild.
One way the relation between snowfall and winter temperature CANNOT be described is that warmth leads to more big snowstorms and greater total winter snowfall.
love the pr spin machine
It's Time to Bow
to the Flying Global Warming Monster
CLIMATEGATE...mate..
And while the self-proclaimed saviors of the ecosystem take the limo from the jet to their latest eco-conference, the ordinary citizen is called on the carpet for spending an extra minute in the shower....how about free ligh bulbs..or free solar cells on ya roof..great in the day...but ya run on coal at night..
But no amount of tips is ever enough.
Because there is no such thing as a green lifestyle. Trying to do things the "Green" way usually ends up being worse for the environment. From ethanol to reusable bags to organic food, everything you do only makes the planet sicker.
...
Global Warming is not science, it's six-tenths greed and four-tenths ideological fanaticism angled against the unlimited potential of humanity. Some will grow rich off it. Most will be impoverished.
Like most cults only a privileged few are allowed at the top.
Yes, Virginia, you do have to produce those 'Global Warming' documents
In response to a previous FOIA request, U.Va. denied these records existed. However, during Cuccinelli's pre-investigation under the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act ("FATA"), a 2007 law passed unanimously by Virginia's legislature, which clearly covers the work of taxpayer-funded academics, U.Va. stunningly dropped this stance. For this reversal, the taxpayers of Virginia owe Cuccinelli a debt of gratitude.
Still, the school has spent upward of half a million dollars to date fighting Cuccinelli's pursuit, now before the Virginia Supreme Court. However, Virginia's transparency statute FOIA gives the school one week to produce the documents, and offers no exemption for claims U.Va. is using to block Cuccinelli's inquiry.
Webmaster's Commentary:
One of the bright stars of the global warming cult
may turn out to be a crook!
End Democracy To Save Planet Says IPCC
By: Saladin
Prof. Shearman’s book makes no attempt to hide it’s fascist ideals. The introduction reads:
In short, Shearman and Smith argue that liberal democracy – considered sacrosanct in modern societies – is an impediment to finding ecologically sustainable solutions for the planet.
In other words they think we need fascism to save the planet.
Shearman and his co-author Gary Sauer-Thompson, in ‘Green or Gone’ propose the formation of an ‘elite warrior leadership’ to force the people to change their lifestyles.
Are huge northeast snow storms due to global warming?
There are several ways to describe the relation between winter temperature and snowfall….
* Colder winters are three times more likely to be snowier than the median.
* Snowy winters are three times more likely to be cold.
* Warm winters are three times more likely to have less snow than the median.
* Less snowy winters are three times more likely to be mild.
One way the relation between snowfall and winter temperature CANNOT be described is that warmth leads to more big snowstorms and greater total winter snowfall.
un-wholy holy..all land belongs to god
ISRAELI RIGHT
APPLAUDS ALL THAT IS WRONG
The Knesset has resolved to create a parliamentary committee of inquiry to look into the activities of left-wing groups “and their contribution to the delegitimization campaign against Israel.”
Such a panel would make even Senator Joseph McCarthy blush.
Webmaster's Commentary:
Israel is delegitimized by their actions, but by words. Israel's government holds the world record for most United Nations resolutions defied. That delegitimizes Israel. Israel has never drawn their borders.
That delegitimizes Israel.
After 60 years, Israel still has not created a constitution. That delegitimizes Israel. Israel has stolen vast amounts of lands belonging to Palestine, Syria, Lebanon, etc. etc, etc. That delegitimizes Israel.
Israel continually provokes wars. That delegitimizes Israel.
Israel attacked and killed Americans on the USS Liberty,
then blamed the attack on Egypt to trick the US into war on Israel's enemies.
When the plan failed they claimed the whole thing was a "misunderstanding."
That delegitimizes Israel.
Israel attacked a humanitarian aid mission in international waters, murdering aid works and hijacking ships, then tried to excuse their behavior with faked video and audio recordings. That delegitimizes Israel.
Israel bribes/blacmales the media to report the news to favor Israel.
That delegitimizes Israel.
Israel continues to bleed other nations for vast sums of money.
over 1.2 trillion from usa alone..earmarks are great..
That delegitimizes Israel.
Israel broke a six-month cease fire with Gaza 11/4/2008, then followed it up with an attack on the civilians of Gaza using illegal weapons, which resulted in a United nations report for war crimes. Israel, usually the first to whine to the United Nations when aggrieved, ignored the report and attacked its author.
That delegitimizes Israel.
Israel has been caught assassinating people around the world, including most recently Dubai, Egypt, and Iraq. That delegitimizes Israel.
The Lavon affair. That delegitimizes Israel.
9-11. That delegitimizes Israel.
And on and on and on and on.
Israel has delegitimized itself
by refusing to act like a modern civilized nation.
Over the last 60 years Israel has become used to simply doing as it pleases and screaming "holocaust" and "Anti-Semite" at everyone to evade the consequences, while looting the wealth of every other nation that has allowed them access to their financial systems.
Old habits die hard, and I rather doubt
Israel can change..enough to be seen as legitimate any time soon.
but hey some things
you just have to leave..for god..
in the meantime..well...come to the forth reiche
the last appartheid state..mate
were building our own walls
come to the encirclement..stake your claim
ps bring water
APPLAUDS ALL THAT IS WRONG
The Knesset has resolved to create a parliamentary committee of inquiry to look into the activities of left-wing groups “and their contribution to the delegitimization campaign against Israel.”
Such a panel would make even Senator Joseph McCarthy blush.
Webmaster's Commentary:
Israel is delegitimized by their actions, but by words. Israel's government holds the world record for most United Nations resolutions defied. That delegitimizes Israel. Israel has never drawn their borders.
That delegitimizes Israel.
After 60 years, Israel still has not created a constitution. That delegitimizes Israel. Israel has stolen vast amounts of lands belonging to Palestine, Syria, Lebanon, etc. etc, etc. That delegitimizes Israel.
Israel continually provokes wars. That delegitimizes Israel.
Israel attacked and killed Americans on the USS Liberty,
then blamed the attack on Egypt to trick the US into war on Israel's enemies.
When the plan failed they claimed the whole thing was a "misunderstanding."
That delegitimizes Israel.
Israel attacked a humanitarian aid mission in international waters, murdering aid works and hijacking ships, then tried to excuse their behavior with faked video and audio recordings. That delegitimizes Israel.
Israel bribes/blacmales the media to report the news to favor Israel.
That delegitimizes Israel.
Israel continues to bleed other nations for vast sums of money.
over 1.2 trillion from usa alone..earmarks are great..
That delegitimizes Israel.
Israel broke a six-month cease fire with Gaza 11/4/2008, then followed it up with an attack on the civilians of Gaza using illegal weapons, which resulted in a United nations report for war crimes. Israel, usually the first to whine to the United Nations when aggrieved, ignored the report and attacked its author.
That delegitimizes Israel.
Israel has been caught assassinating people around the world, including most recently Dubai, Egypt, and Iraq. That delegitimizes Israel.
The Lavon affair. That delegitimizes Israel.
9-11. That delegitimizes Israel.
And on and on and on and on.
Israel has delegitimized itself
by refusing to act like a modern civilized nation.
Over the last 60 years Israel has become used to simply doing as it pleases and screaming "holocaust" and "Anti-Semite" at everyone to evade the consequences, while looting the wealth of every other nation that has allowed them access to their financial systems.
Old habits die hard, and I rather doubt
Israel can change..enough to be seen as legitimate any time soon.
but hey some things
you just have to leave..for god..
in the meantime..well...come to the forth reiche
the last appartheid state..mate
were building our own walls
come to the encirclement..stake your claim
ps bring water
pole shift stuff
Shift of Earth's magnetic north pole affects Tampa airport
Scientists say the magnetic north pole is moving toward Russia and the fallout has reached -- of all places -- Tampa International Airport.
The airport has closed its primary runway until Jan. 13 to repaint the numeric designators at each end and change taxiway signage to account for the shift in location of the Earth's magnetic north pole.
Webmaster's Commentary:
In other news, Al Gore emerged from hiding to denounce the damage to the Earth's magnetic poles caused by blogging, in particular the website whatreallyhappened.com which draws so much traffic..from around the word..that the signals racing along the wires across the globe..*is shifting the Earth's magnetic poles,
which in turn accelerates global warming, killer bees, chemtrails, HAARP, and waxy yellow buildup..in the corners of your kitchen floors!
Mr. Gore called for an immediate magnet tax
and a global magnetic authority to deal with the crisis!
Mr. Gore will set up a magnet brokerage where people will buy
and sell..magnet credits and magnet futures.
Scientists say the magnetic north pole is moving toward Russia and the fallout has reached -- of all places -- Tampa International Airport.
The airport has closed its primary runway until Jan. 13 to repaint the numeric designators at each end and change taxiway signage to account for the shift in location of the Earth's magnetic north pole.
Webmaster's Commentary:
In other news, Al Gore emerged from hiding to denounce the damage to the Earth's magnetic poles caused by blogging, in particular the website whatreallyhappened.com which draws so much traffic..from around the word..that the signals racing along the wires across the globe..*is shifting the Earth's magnetic poles,
which in turn accelerates global warming, killer bees, chemtrails, HAARP, and waxy yellow buildup..in the corners of your kitchen floors!
Mr. Gore called for an immediate magnet tax
and a global magnetic authority to deal with the crisis!
Mr. Gore will set up a magnet brokerage where people will buy
and sell..magnet credits and magnet futures.
ursury,inflation,bankers..fed fiat money-creators
We share one common enemy, and that is the private central bankers who live each day convinced that looting the Earth to enrich themselves is blessed by the gods they sacrifice other people's lives to.
T"The powers of financial capitalism had a far-reaching aim - nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements [BIS] in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations ... Each central bank sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world." -- Carroll Quigley in his book "Tragedy and Hope" he enemy is easy to recognize. They are the ones insisting that "You must make do with less so that we can have more." Everything else is just regional branding to sell the same snake oil.
"You must make do with less so that we can have more."
"You must make do with less so that we can have more."
"You must make do with less so that we can have more."
we will deflate your valuble money
take your gold/silver coin
and give you paper
will lend you unlimited credit
but you must pay in paper we own..to earn the paper [our paper]
you must work for those getting their paper from us...[those who agree to pay back more paper than we lend them..this shall be called ursury...intrest...you will be getting the paper promise..[ie promised to have value..by royal fiat..[royal promise]
it has value because govt says so
but govt will lend it from us
at intrest...they will give us govt bonds
and they will pay the intrest with ever more taxes on you
Zimbabwe is just the latest of a long string of failed fiat currencies. A currency need not undergo hyperinflation, however, to be rendered worthless.
Since its inception in 1913, the Federal Reserve Note (“U.S. Dollar”) has lost 96% of its value through a steady (and sinisterly mis-reported) inflation
we will stop people trying to make money be linked again to real values..[like gold silver]..or even copper coins...and just hold the global monopoly on paper
in the end you cant eat paper
but will pay ursury...bankers never loose
oh by the way..http://www.silverdoctors.com/derivatives-how-the-tiny-silver-market-could-take-down-the-system/#more-39954
dont complain..we control the media...and they owe us lots of extra paper
this is a rigged game
any wonder jesus upset the money changers tables
but if you try
hey we have laws
we will just call ...'you'..an eco t-erroist
or a trouble maker...and do to you as we done to jfk
and several other presidents before you
oh you shall not check the gold in fort knox..we leased it
and the gold coverd stuff in there now is rusting
just like your copper one cent is only copper coated
not real copper...[but why is the queend head in the coin
hey were working on that...we now got the euro...
T"The powers of financial capitalism had a far-reaching aim - nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements [BIS] in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations ... Each central bank sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world." -- Carroll Quigley in his book "Tragedy and Hope" he enemy is easy to recognize. They are the ones insisting that "You must make do with less so that we can have more." Everything else is just regional branding to sell the same snake oil.
"You must make do with less so that we can have more."
"You must make do with less so that we can have more."
"You must make do with less so that we can have more."
we will deflate your valuble money
take your gold/silver coin
and give you paper
will lend you unlimited credit
but you must pay in paper we own..to earn the paper [our paper]
you must work for those getting their paper from us...[those who agree to pay back more paper than we lend them..this shall be called ursury...intrest...you will be getting the paper promise..[ie promised to have value..by royal fiat..[royal promise]
it has value because govt says so
but govt will lend it from us
at intrest...they will give us govt bonds
and they will pay the intrest with ever more taxes on you
Zimbabwe is just the latest of a long string of failed fiat currencies. A currency need not undergo hyperinflation, however, to be rendered worthless.
Since its inception in 1913, the Federal Reserve Note (“U.S. Dollar”) has lost 96% of its value through a steady (and sinisterly mis-reported) inflation
we will stop people trying to make money be linked again to real values..[like gold silver]..or even copper coins...and just hold the global monopoly on paper
in the end you cant eat paper
but will pay ursury...bankers never loose
oh by the way..http://www.silverdoctors.com/derivatives-how-the-tiny-silver-market-could-take-down-the-system/#more-39954
dont complain..we control the media...and they owe us lots of extra paper
this is a rigged game
any wonder jesus upset the money changers tables
but if you try
hey we have laws
we will just call ...'you'..an eco t-erroist
or a trouble maker...and do to you as we done to jfk
and several other presidents before you
oh you shall not check the gold in fort knox..we leased it
and the gold coverd stuff in there now is rusting
just like your copper one cent is only copper coated
not real copper...[but why is the queend head in the coin
hey were working on that...we now got the euro...
the s/wine into birdflue scam
Unused swine flu vaccine
turns into hazardous waste
By: malterwitty
Swine flu vaccine left over from the winter 2009/2010 vacination campaign expires these days and therefore has to be disposed. Due to the content of mercury added as Thimerosal (also known as Thiomersal) to most of the vaccines that depending on the manufacturer can reach 25-50 ppm in the vaccine,
*the left overs..have to be handled as "hazardous waste".*
http://www.speciation.net/News/Unused-swine-flu-vaccine-turns-into-hazardous-waste-;~/2010/04/14/4970.html
lest we forget
the un declared it to have pandemic status..*
unspoken of at the time was MANY govts all over the world...had SIGNED binding orders for the flue...IF,,..the un declares a pandemic
well the chemical monopoly did get just that
because of ...VIA..media manipluation
and billion of tax dollars
maybe trillions GLOBALLY...bought this POISEN
now it hazardous waste..*
and they WERE PUMPING it into our kids
its time to stop the lies
the truth is worse than we could ever have believed
remember..ADVERSE reaction..to prescribed drugs kills millions each decade
1 in 100 hospital admissions..results in death..by ADVERSE REACTION to perscribed drugs
then they perscribe other drugs...to the non lethal adverse reactions
worse..govt subsidies...the rubbish...to the tune of trillions globally
its called corperate welfare...where the corperate sector..get govt aid..bailouts
dont get into the banker bailouts of the financial industry
thats the corperat welfdare staw that breaks our tax payers backs
nor the subsidy to this green scam..global warning
or the scam re carbon taxation..on everything
its all lies
all about getting govt m,oney
into corperate tax havens
but lets kill one bird/swine with word-stones..first
Old pandemic flu vaccines may plug shortfall, PM says
By: malterwitty
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-12122879
The government is considering using leftover vaccine from the swine flu pandemic to plug the shortfall in jabs this winter, the prime minister says.
See also: Swine flu vaccines will contain additive axed after health scare
as link dont work here is the extract
NOTE THE LAST WORDS
[again with...PANDEMIC special-conditions..lol..
the escape clause...was it a pandemic..[ie un declared it..yes
do anything you like..the un says its ok..IN A PANDEMIC..!]
even if declared by fraud
Swine flu vaccines will contain additive axed after health scare
Alex Plough and Anna Davis
25 Sep 2009
Ads by Google
Flu Vaccination
Protect your staff for 2011. Visit our website for more info.
www.nabenet.com.au
Influenza H1N3 Research
Recombinant H1N3 Hemagglutinin World Influenza Research Center
SinoBiological.com/Influenza_H1N3
Flu Staff Protection
Office telephones and computers disinfected TCA
www.teleclean.com.au
iMEDICALlife
Flu shots, all workplace medical 24hr 365 days. NSW VIC
www.imedicallife.com.au
Britain's stockpile of swine flu vaccines will contain a controversial additive that has been removed from other childhood jabs.
The mercury based preservative Thiomersal has caused a health scare in America, but there is no evidence it is harmful.
It was removed from vaccines in the US as a “precautionary measure” and has not been used in childhood inoculations in Britain since 2004.
But it will be used in most of Britain's swine flu vaccines for its properties as a preservative.
Professor David Salisbury, the Department of Health's director of immunisation, said: “There is a very clear view in the scientific community that there is no risk from the inclusion of Thiomersal in vaccines. The medical community is not divided on this. The only place where people say there is a problem is outside the scientific community.”
Fears were raised that Thiomersal could be linked to autism when the American Academy of Pediatrics and the US Public Health Service called for it to be removed from vaccines in 1999 as a precautionary measure.
But this led to a health scare, with parents claiming the substance must be harmful if it was being removed.
In 2004 the British government began using childhood vaccines that did not contain the preservative.
Professor Nikolai Petrovsky, Chairman of the Australian company Vaxine that is producing a Thiomersal-free swine flu vaccine, said he would not give his children a vaccine that contained the preservative.
But Professor Salisbury said Thiomersal was not purposefully removed from British vaccines.
He said: “Thiomersal was not removed in the UK. It was simply that the vaccines that we were moving to didn't contain it.
“There was no problem with it in the first place.”
Professor Adam Finn, professor of paediatrics at Bristol University, said the decision to remove Thiomersal from vaccines in America made “everyone concerned that there must have been a problem in the first place. This gave a lot of impetus to the whole idea.”
He said the UK government announced it was going to use a new type of childhood vaccine that did not contain the Thiomersal - although that was not the reason for the change.
Professor Finn added: “The government thought people would be pleased to know Thiomersal had gone, even though they didn't think there was a problem with it in the first place.
“They sleep walked into the same situation as the US did.
“But if you really try to find any evidence that this stuff does any harm, you can't find it. It is just not there.”
A spokeswoman for GlaxoSmithKline, which is making most of Britain's vaccine supply, said: “For every new medicine we do a benefit risk profile. In terms of bodies of evidence studies have shown there is no causal link between Thiomersal and autism.”
The European Medicines Agency and the World Health Organisation's Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety () have approved the use of Thiomersal in pandemic vaccines.
A spokeswoman for the department of health said: “Vaccines in the current childhood schedule are single-dose for immediate use, which means a preservative is not needed. The GSK swine flu vaccine is multi-dose to increase production capacity, so a preservative is required.”
She added: “The European Medicines Agency has strict processes in place for licensing pandemic vaccines.
other news
11:03
Fort Detrick's Biowarfare-ville "Suspiciously High?" Cancer Cases to be Studied
By: tyler durden
Tags: 911 HIDDEN HISTORY SCIENCE/HEALTH/CLIMATE/NATURE WMD
From the Files of the Painfully Obvious: Maryland public health officials say certain cancers appear to occur at younger ages among people living near Fort Detrick in Frederick than in people statewide.
Ed. Note: Due to people dropping like flies in Frederick, MD, as the Gov says from some "unknown" in this Bioligical/Chemical Warfare Industry town, there are always job vacancies even during this engineered depression, a jobs program if you will...
Jan
06
11:03
The Biggest CES Flops of All Time
turns into hazardous waste
By: malterwitty
Swine flu vaccine left over from the winter 2009/2010 vacination campaign expires these days and therefore has to be disposed. Due to the content of mercury added as Thimerosal (also known as Thiomersal) to most of the vaccines that depending on the manufacturer can reach 25-50 ppm in the vaccine,
*the left overs..have to be handled as "hazardous waste".*
http://www.speciation.net/News/Unused-swine-flu-vaccine-turns-into-hazardous-waste-;~/2010/04/14/4970.html
lest we forget
the un declared it to have pandemic status..*
unspoken of at the time was MANY govts all over the world...had SIGNED binding orders for the flue...IF,,..the un declares a pandemic
well the chemical monopoly did get just that
because of ...VIA..media manipluation
and billion of tax dollars
maybe trillions GLOBALLY...bought this POISEN
now it hazardous waste..*
and they WERE PUMPING it into our kids
its time to stop the lies
the truth is worse than we could ever have believed
remember..ADVERSE reaction..to prescribed drugs kills millions each decade
1 in 100 hospital admissions..results in death..by ADVERSE REACTION to perscribed drugs
then they perscribe other drugs...to the non lethal adverse reactions
worse..govt subsidies...the rubbish...to the tune of trillions globally
its called corperate welfare...where the corperate sector..get govt aid..bailouts
dont get into the banker bailouts of the financial industry
thats the corperat welfdare staw that breaks our tax payers backs
nor the subsidy to this green scam..global warning
or the scam re carbon taxation..on everything
its all lies
all about getting govt m,oney
into corperate tax havens
but lets kill one bird/swine with word-stones..first
Old pandemic flu vaccines may plug shortfall, PM says
By: malterwitty
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-12122879
The government is considering using leftover vaccine from the swine flu pandemic to plug the shortfall in jabs this winter, the prime minister says.
See also: Swine flu vaccines will contain additive axed after health scare
as link dont work here is the extract
NOTE THE LAST WORDS
[again with...PANDEMIC special-conditions..lol..
the escape clause...was it a pandemic..[ie un declared it..yes
do anything you like..the un says its ok..IN A PANDEMIC..!]
even if declared by fraud
Swine flu vaccines will contain additive axed after health scare
Alex Plough and Anna Davis
25 Sep 2009
Ads by Google
Flu Vaccination
Protect your staff for 2011. Visit our website for more info.
www.nabenet.com.au
Influenza H1N3 Research
Recombinant H1N3 Hemagglutinin World Influenza Research Center
SinoBiological.com/Influenza_H1N3
Flu Staff Protection
Office telephones and computers disinfected TCA
www.teleclean.com.au
iMEDICALlife
Flu shots, all workplace medical 24hr 365 days. NSW VIC
www.imedicallife.com.au
Britain's stockpile of swine flu vaccines will contain a controversial additive that has been removed from other childhood jabs.
The mercury based preservative Thiomersal has caused a health scare in America, but there is no evidence it is harmful.
It was removed from vaccines in the US as a “precautionary measure” and has not been used in childhood inoculations in Britain since 2004.
But it will be used in most of Britain's swine flu vaccines for its properties as a preservative.
Professor David Salisbury, the Department of Health's director of immunisation, said: “There is a very clear view in the scientific community that there is no risk from the inclusion of Thiomersal in vaccines. The medical community is not divided on this. The only place where people say there is a problem is outside the scientific community.”
Fears were raised that Thiomersal could be linked to autism when the American Academy of Pediatrics and the US Public Health Service called for it to be removed from vaccines in 1999 as a precautionary measure.
But this led to a health scare, with parents claiming the substance must be harmful if it was being removed.
In 2004 the British government began using childhood vaccines that did not contain the preservative.
Professor Nikolai Petrovsky, Chairman of the Australian company Vaxine that is producing a Thiomersal-free swine flu vaccine, said he would not give his children a vaccine that contained the preservative.
But Professor Salisbury said Thiomersal was not purposefully removed from British vaccines.
He said: “Thiomersal was not removed in the UK. It was simply that the vaccines that we were moving to didn't contain it.
“There was no problem with it in the first place.”
Professor Adam Finn, professor of paediatrics at Bristol University, said the decision to remove Thiomersal from vaccines in America made “everyone concerned that there must have been a problem in the first place. This gave a lot of impetus to the whole idea.”
He said the UK government announced it was going to use a new type of childhood vaccine that did not contain the Thiomersal - although that was not the reason for the change.
Professor Finn added: “The government thought people would be pleased to know Thiomersal had gone, even though they didn't think there was a problem with it in the first place.
“They sleep walked into the same situation as the US did.
“But if you really try to find any evidence that this stuff does any harm, you can't find it. It is just not there.”
A spokeswoman for GlaxoSmithKline, which is making most of Britain's vaccine supply, said: “For every new medicine we do a benefit risk profile. In terms of bodies of evidence studies have shown there is no causal link between Thiomersal and autism.”
The European Medicines Agency and the World Health Organisation's Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety () have approved the use of Thiomersal in pandemic vaccines.
A spokeswoman for the department of health said: “Vaccines in the current childhood schedule are single-dose for immediate use, which means a preservative is not needed. The GSK swine flu vaccine is multi-dose to increase production capacity, so a preservative is required.”
She added: “The European Medicines Agency has strict processes in place for licensing pandemic vaccines.
other news
11:03
Fort Detrick's Biowarfare-ville "Suspiciously High?" Cancer Cases to be Studied
By: tyler durden
Tags: 911 HIDDEN HISTORY SCIENCE/HEALTH/CLIMATE/NATURE WMD
From the Files of the Painfully Obvious: Maryland public health officials say certain cancers appear to occur at younger ages among people living near Fort Detrick in Frederick than in people statewide.
Ed. Note: Due to people dropping like flies in Frederick, MD, as the Gov says from some "unknown" in this Bioligical/Chemical Warfare Industry town, there are always job vacancies even during this engineered depression, a jobs program if you will...
Jan
06
11:03
The Biggest CES Flops of All Time
11 th new word order..he-ELl..cia-ada..
Are we humans subjected to evil influences..from another realm outside our own physical world on Earth....from where evil deeds..on earth originate?
satan didnt do the evil
we did...or rather it is blamed on US..[c-i-a]..eh!
[there is a joinder..[con-junction]..
of evil in-fluences..[of hell..with evil-minds]
with..us needing to think evil...FIRST...our thought attract..those who will seek to destroy the earth
thats how ..simply
vile..is claiming its own
there is no opposite to god..[good]
just as real..has no opposite..[lie]..because good..is the only truth.
evil is a lie..thus not good..
thus not in the end..true*
its convoluted...but only good..[god]..is real.
Is there..any dispute on/its adherence..to belief
in the spiritual in-fluences..of good over evil?>>..yes
its inverted...
good..has no influence over evil
just as evil..can have no influence over true good
It is the reality of our life that expresses the very character
of who we are, our attitudes etc..that demonstrates our selfish.or our loving heart
dominant sin..grips them..as in..a vice,..and their chief thoughts..
run on the lines..it has marked out...in this..its previous material life...
Take the Officer, whose dominant vices..were hate and ruthlessness...He thought hate,..*that produced an atmosphere of cruelty..and hate,..and his
companions were likewise..doing/thinking..the same ideas.
The sum total of their united ideas
formed that division of Hell.
Thursday, January 6, 2011
11 Reasons Why The Threat From Al-Qaeda is Not Real
active links at
http://redactednews.blogspot.com/2011/01/11-reasons-why-threat-from-al-qaeda-is.html
Oh,a word of caution. Sometimes the most destructive thing can be to devote yourSelf Heart & Soul to a no win situation. Right or wrong often doesn't come into it you know? Only the prevailing law and the evidence that has been collected to substantiate a charge in regards to an alleged breach of same.
you would be wise to consider that in relation to what you know and how you choose to proceed.
Be aware that your current conduct has the potential to influence proceedings one way or the other, as everything relevant up to the day of judgment may be considered, if that is relevant to your circumstances, not just what has already transpired.
..
The United States government has repeatedly stated that the treat from Al-Qaeda against America is very real, and that all action is being taken to eliminate that threat. Nobody in their right mind would question such a serious assessment about a sensitive national security matter from the world's leading democracy. But the truth is that over the past fifty years America's democratic institutions like the press have been weakened, and an elitist National Security State has risen, and taken control over all aspects of government.
Since World War II U.S. leaders have consistently lied to the American people about foreign threats in order to feed the military machine's appetite for war. All of these wars are unjust and unwarranted but that does not stop the self-interested criminals who control U.S. foreign policy. A recent example of a lie they told was their assertion that Saddam Hussein was in possession of weapons of mass destruction. That episode revealed to many people the true nature of the American government. Simply put, it does not care about the truth, or the American people, or the members of the military. U.S. leaders like former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, and current Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, to name but a few, tell lies at will. Dishonesty means nothing to them. They deceive the American people, the American military, and the world about their motives and methods - and they lie to themselves about their own powers and abilities.
Next to the hundreds of thousands of innocent people who were slaughtered by the American war machine in its numerous criminal wars, U.S. soldiers have suffered the most - way more than the rest of the population in America. It can't be said enough that the U.S. government's treatment of its soldiers is scandalous and shameful.
..It is so out of whack that in America today dogs are treated better than military vets. Some dogs are even treated to luxurious spas while military vets are denied the proper health care that they deserve. Instead, they're left to rot, and commit suicide. And for what? To defend America? To defeat Al-Qaeda? Or to keep the war machine and its benefactors rich and powerful? As you will see by the end of this post, it is the latter.
I. Setting The Historical Scene: The United States Government And The American Mainstream Media Are Anti-Democracy, Anti-Freedom, Anti-Peace
"All governments lie." said American journalist I. F. Stone. You can add to that great quote "and all newspapers lie, too."
By joining forces together, the CIA and American newspapers sold two criminal wars to the people - a manufactured and destructive "War on Terror," and the Iraq war. Most journalists were not consciously part of the propaganda campaign, they just bought the hype, but, without a doubt, a lot of journalists who work for the CIA knowingly injected false information into their columns and helped spread nationalist fever across America to boost public support for the wars.
Government spies posing as independent journalists is one of the CIA's least kept secrets. Former CIA director William Colby famously said "The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." Carl Bernstein revealed the relationship between the CIA and the media in his 1977 Rolling Stone article "The CIA and the Media." An excerpt:
"Some of these journalists' relationships with the Agency were tacit; some were explicit. There was cooperation, accommodation and overlap. Journalists provided a full range of clandestine services -- from simple intelligence gathering to serving as go-betweens with spies in Communist countries. Reporters shared their notebooks with the CIA. Editors shared their staffs. Some of the journalists were Pulitzer Prize winners, distinguished reporters who considered themselves ambassadors-without-portfolio for their country. Most were less exalted: foreign correspondents who found that their association with the Agency helped their work; stringers and freelancers who were as interested it the derring-do of the spy business as in filing articles, and, the smallest category, full-time CIA employees masquerading as journalists abroad. In many instances, CIA documents show, journalists were engaged to perform tasks for the CIA with the consent of the managements America's leading news organizations."
The media's relationship with the CIA began well before the Vietnam war, but it was after that disastrous war ended when the Pentagon and the CIA took their clandestine media operations to another level. They wanted to completely gut the free press in America, which contributed to the anti-war sentiment in the late 60s and early 70s. Government officials secretly established deep ties to journalists to make sure that the American people would be less informed about America's foreign policy, and future conflicts, and hence, less combative against the government and less anti-war.
The Pentagon has been interested in information warfare for many decades, and the fruits of their studies are applied to the American people, and to foreign enemies. "PSYOP," shorthand for "Psychological Operations," is a propaganda and disinformation Pentagon program that is used in the foreign battlefield to break the will of enemy forces, and make the ensuing battle a little less bloody. It worked wonderfully in the Gulf war. Retired Col. Jim Noll said that PSYOPs was a life-saving military technique. From a 2001 article called "Persian Gulf War 10 years later: Winning the war by convincing the enemy to go home" by Al Zdon:
"The psychological warfare in the end saved many lives, on both sides. "I know many American lives were saved because so many Iraqis had deserted or chose not to fight when we arrived. Many of them were holding up our leaflets to surrender with."
The leaflets were based on the intelligence the Psyops battalion had gained from prisoners. Some showed large bombers dropping their payloads. Others showed tank units how to surrender. Others showed Americans landing from the sea (a military ploy to divert Iraqi defenses. The U.S. never did land from the sea.) Others were printed on fake Iraqi money so the soldiers could conceal them in their wallets."
Wired magazine reported in June that the Pentagon may change the name PSYOP to Military Information Support and/to Operations (MISO). I wrote an article about the proposed name change back in July called "MISO: Making Intelligence Sound Obscure."
The threat by PSYOPS to democracy, and freedom in America cannot be overstated. It is a fact that the Pentagon and the CIA routinely use PSYOPS against the American people to make them support illegal and unnecessary wars. Indeed, it is not a stretch to say that today the United States is a PSYOPS state, not a democratic state.
It should concern all Americans, and all citizens around the world that the CIA and Pentagon are using psychological military techniques inside the United States against the American people. The CIA was created to keep tabs on foreign enemies, not the American people. Former Governor Jesse Ventura has confirmed that the CIA is working within America's borders a number of times in his many television interviews. He says that a cadre of CIA officials questioned him shortly after he won the election in Minnesota as an independent candidate about how he won. Ventura guesses that the CIA questioned him because they were surprised that a political maverick like him succeeded and wanted to know his political strategy in order to prevent a similar candidate from advancing to such a high political position in the future.
Former President Harry Truman criticized the CIA for intervening in domestic affairs in a Washington Post op-ed in 1963: "For some time I have been disturbed by the way the CIA has been diverted from its original assignment. It has become an operational and at times a policy-making arm of the government.... I never had any thought that when I set up the CIA that it would be injected into peacetime cloak and dagger operations."
Philip Agee, who served in the CIA from 1957 to 1968, left the Agency because it failed to uphold the beliefs and values of the American people. He remained a leading critic of CIA policies until his death on January 7, 2008. In his 1975 book "Inside the Company: CIA Diary," Agee warned that the murderous methods used by the CIA and the American empire in foreign lands would be used against the American people. "The killings at Kent State and Jackson State," he wrote, "show clearly enough that sooner or later our counter-insurgency methods would be applied at home." The rise of FEMA, TSA, and the overall police state proves that Agee's prediction was accurate. In fact, the threat of martial law is so severe that it can be declared by the White House in the very near future.
II. Flashback: The Threat From Iraq Was Not Real
Knowing the truth matters in a democracy because without the truth citizens can't make informed decisions about government policies that impact their lives. It is not possible to consciously answer fundamental societal questions like "should we go to war?" without a firm grasp of all the facts at hand. When independent journalists fail to provide the simple and straightforward facts to the public, they become complicit in government murder and fraud, and deserve even more ridicule than dishonest government officials and government-owned journalists.
Had the truth emerged that Saddam Hussein was not in possession of weapons of mass destruction before America invaded Iraq in March of 2003, there would not have been any public support for the war. True, hundreds of thousands of people around the world protested the invasion of Iraq before it was launched, but many people didn't because they believed the lie that Saddam was a dangerous threat and would use WMDs against America if he wasn't taken out. Leaders in the Bush administration used the oldest trick in the book of war to get the people to support a war that was not in their interest: they created a justification. Basically, they lied.
Since a government's justification for war, whether real or contrived, carries weight with a significant amount of people because they accept the word of authority over science and critical thinking, it is crucial to know, especially in societies based on the consent of the people, if a justification given by the government for war is true, or false. In the case of Iraq, as we now know, it was false.
It is a tragedy that the world did not learn the fact that Saddam did not have weapons of mass destruction a lot sooner. Hundreds of thousands of innocent people died in Iraq who could have lived a long and fulfilling life, and the country itself was destroyed in a deliberate and systematic fashion. Dirk Adriaensens, a member of the Executive Committee of the BRussells Tribunal, which is a group that was part of the World Tribunal on Iraq, describes exactly how Iraq was demolished by the sick and murderous U.S. and U.K. governments in his article "Iraq: The Age of Darkness."
Leaders in the Bush administration knew all along that Saddam did not have WMDs and was not a threat, but they wanted to go to war so bad that they made stuff up and presented it as the truth to the whole world. Ellen Knickmeyer, a former Washington Post bureau chief in Baghdad and Cairo, said this much and more in an article she wrote in October after WikiLeaks published hundreds of thousands of Iraq war logs. "Recent revelations by WikiLeaks," Knickmeyer said, "show how top American leaders lied, knowingly, to the American public, to American troops, and to the world."
Some defenders of the Iraq war insist that it was noble and good because a tyrant was removed from power. This is a poisonous and dangerous half-truth. Indeed, it is true that Saddam was a vicious tyrant, and a godforsaken man, but his removal from power didn't require a huge ground invasion and subsequent military occupation since he had no real support from his people and military. But that's beside the point because removing tyrants from power is not an objective of U.S. foreign policy. And it should not be. Tyrants are always removed from below, never from above.
If American leaders truly cared about the rule of law and democracy in Iraq they would have presented their case to the United Nations that Saddam was a war criminal for gassing the Kurds, which would have been met with agreement, and from there a variety of peaceful and legal means would have been recommended by the international community to bring Saddam to justice. If he then resisted international arrest, there would be a legal justification for using force to capture him and bring him to trial. But that course was not taken by American leaders because justice was only on their lips, not on their minds. American leaders and the CIA, unfortunately, are destroyers - not defenders - of democracy and the rule of a law. The same is true for Israeli leaders and Mossad. They are counterfeiters and war criminals who deserve to be hanged, not defended and praised.
Noam Chomsky said on Democracy Now last week that the political leadership in both the United States and Israel share a "profound hatred for democracy." This statement gets at the truth of the current political reality in Washington and Tel Aviv, but U.S. and Israeli don't just hate democracy, they also hate the American people, humanity, truth, honor, peace, and all that is good and righteous in the world.
Just as Iraq was destroyed by design by U.S. leaders, America is being destroyed by design by U.S. leaders. The American people are coming to this realization reluctantly, but they're coming to it at last. They are beginning to discover that their country is in ruins not by accident but from other causes, namely, that their top leaders are traitors who desire the destruction of America and the advancement of a new world order in which their illegally acquired power and wealth grows evermore.
Both Herodotus and Socrates said "The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance." Knowledge of the cause for war brings good into the world, ignorance of the causes of war brings evil into the world. Despite what we have been taught, war is not natural. Wars occur because it is profitable for ruling elites. Orwell relayed this truth to the people before the Second World War began, and when it ended, after millions of people died, historian Howard Zinn taught it to people for decades, up to the start of the Iraq war. In 2006 he wrote, "war itself is the enemy of the human race."
To defeat war, humanity's collective enemy, we must learn the truth for why there is war in our time. When asked why America is at war American leaders always point to the attacks on September 11, 2001, but the official account of what happened on that day is not true. New scientific evidence gathered by a collection of physicists, scientists, architects, and engineers, among them Steven E. Jones, Niels Harrit, and Richard Gage, proves unequivocally that the towers, including the rarely mentioned building 7, collapsed due to controlled demolition using explosives.
American leaders told one of the greatest lies in human history when they said that Al-Qaeda was responsible for the 9/11 attacks. That lie spawned an immediate and criminal invasion of Afghanistan, and a much larger, and more consequential global war on terrorism that is still being waged in numerous countries more than nine years after the attacks. Former President George W. Bush also used the 9/11 lie to paint Saddam Hussein as a supporter of terrorism. In his State of the Union Address on January 28, 2003,Bush said: "Evidence from intelligence sources, secret communications and statements by people now in custody reveal that Saddam Hussein aids and protects terrorists, including members of Al Qaida." This statement later was proven to be a complete lie. Saddam had no connections to Al-Qaeda.
President Barack Obama has frequently relied on the 9/11 lie to support his administration's war in Afghanistan. After the Christmas Day airliner bombing attempt last December, which also remains a dubious event because the bomber was boarded onto the plane with help from an unmentioned person who is presumed to be an intelligence official, Obama said: "We are at war against al Qaeda, a far-reaching network of violence and hatred that attacked us on 9/11, that killed nearly 3,000 innocent people and that is plotting to strike us again. And we will do whatever it takes to defeat them."
Obama was blatantly lying when he said that Al-Qaeda is a "far-reaching network of violence and hatred." Once you research the origins of Al-Qaeda, which in Arabic simply means "the base," you can't help but view American leaders like Bush and Obama as devilish tricksters who are trying to pull the wool over our eyes.
III. 11 Reasons Why The Threat From Al-Qaeda is Not Real
Al-Qaeda is either one of these things, or it is a combination of them: a) a completely fake threat; the organization does not exist, b) an organization that exists in small numbers but was created by the CIA to serve a corrupt U.S. foreign policy, and remains a U.S. intelligence asset in the manufactured global war on terrorism, or c) a small organization that exists independently of the U.S. government but its strength and influence in the Middle East is exaggerated by radical policymakers and officials in Washington. Out of all three statements the first and second deserve the most serious attention because they are supported by the evidence listed below.
#1. Radical American cleric Anwar Al-Awlaki, who was ordered to be assassinated by President Obama, met with top military officials at the Pentagon months after the 9/11 attacks. Were Pentagon officials sincerely interested in reaching out to members of the Muslim community, or were they recruiting radical Muslim clerics to spread the message of radical Islam in order to validate and sustain the Bush administration's war on terror? It is not outrageous or crazy to raise the question if the U.S. government aims to inflame radical Islam, even by funding and supporting undercover intelligence agents that front as terrorists, in order to make the American people perceive that they are in danger of violent Islamic extremism, and cause them to give up their liberties for permanent security.
An alarming piece of news is that follows an undeniable pattern of government-induced terrorist activity is of an FBI informant, Craig Monteilh, who infiltrated a Mosque in California, and shouted violent rhetoric with the intention to entrap potential terrorists, and then sell it to the public that "Hey, the FBI arrested someone at a Mosque who wanted to blow a building up," without mentioning the fact that the FBI agent was the one who got the ball rolling in the first place. In this case, however, the government's plan to attract and create terrorists didn't work. The Washington Post reported: "In the Irvine case, Monteilh's mission as an informant backfired. Muslims were so alarmed by his talk of violent jihad that they obtained a restraining order against him."
#2. CIA Director Leon Panetta revealed in June 2010 on ABC's This Week that there are less than 100 Al-Qaeda members in the Afghanistan-Pakistan region. "I think the estimate on the number of Al Qaeda," said Panetta, "is actually relatively small. At most, we're looking at 50 to 100, maybe less. It's in that vicinity." By contrast, there are more than 100,000 American soldiers and military contractors in the region. You can't call it a fair fight. You can't even say "it's not a fair fight," because, in reality, it is not a fight at all. It is not a fight. 50,000 Al-Qaeda members would make it a fight. It still wouldn't be a fair fight, but it would be a fight.
#3. The International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), one of the world's leading security think tanks, published a report this year which said that the threat of Al-Qaeda and the Taliban is exaggerated by Western policymakers. The report warned that the war in Afghanistan will become a "long, drawn-out disaster" if troops are not withdrawn. Nigel Inkster, a former deputy chief of Britain's Secret Intelligence Service who is a member of the think tank, also said that the threat from Al-Qaeda in Pakistan is minimal, and almost absent in Yemen, and Somalia.
Commenting on the report by the IISS, journalist and author Eric Margolis said:
"The IISS’s findings are a direct challenge to Obama, Britain’s new prime minister, David Cameron, and other US allies with troops in Afghanistan. This report undermines their rational used to sustain the increasingly unpopular conflict. It will certainly convince sceptics that the real reason for occupation of Afghanistan has to do with oil, excluding China from the region, and keeping watch on nuclear-armed Pakistan."
#4. Former US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said in an interview to the Los Angeles Times's Patt Morrison in October 2010 that Al-Qaeda doesn't exist. "The organization that did 9/11 — that Al Qaeda — I don't think really exists," said Rice. The statement is shocking, to say the least, and contradicts the official 9/11 story which is built on the premise that Al-Qaeda, regarded as an Islamic terrorist group by the United States, England, Canada, Israel, Saudi Arabia and many other governments, was large and sophisticated enough to plan and execute the biggest terrorist attack in the United States. Apparently, Rice doesn't agree with President Obama that Al-Qaeda is a "far-reaching network of violence."
#5. The U.S. government created, and funded Islamic fundamentalism in the 1980s to be used to draw the Soviet Union into Afghanistan, and bleed it to death in a costly and unwinnable war. This was no doubt a smart move when you have a strategic hat on, when you are sitting comfortably on the seat of power, but when you are confronting issues of peace and war, life and death, coexistence and annihilation, on a very small planet, it was a very cynical and dangerous error. Zbigniew Brzezinski, who is considered a realist in foreign policy circles and a critic of Israel, was one of the leaders behind the operation as President Jimmy Carter's National Security Advisor. In an interview he gave to a weekly French magazine called "Le Nouvel Observateur" in January 1998 he discussed how and why the U.S. funded Muslim terrorists (or freedom fighters, depending on your outlook). Excerpt from the interview:
Q: When the Soviets justified their intervention by asserting that they intended to fight against a secret involvement of the United States in Afghanistan, people didn't believe them. However, there was a basis of truth. You don't regret anything today?
Brzezinski: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter. We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam War. Indeed, for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war unsupportable by the government, a conflict that brought about the demoralization and finally the break-up of the Soviet empire.
The fact that America trained and funded a terrorist network in Central Asia less than two decades before the September 11, 2001 attacks is a relevant historical fact. It raises the strong possibility that after the Soviet Union collapsed the CIA used their terrorist network to promote U.S. foreign policy by covert means, including in the United States on September 11, 2001.
#6. Robin Cook, who served as a British MP for 22 years and as Foreign Secretary from 1997 to 2001, wrote an article for the Guardian in July 2005, a month before his death, called "The struggle against terrorism cannot be won by military means." Throughout the article Cook makes many devastating critiques of the West's war on terror, but here is a quote that requires our greatest attention:
"Bin Laden was, though, a product of a monumental miscalculation by western security agencies. Throughout the 80s he was armed by the CIA and funded by the Saudis to wage jihad against the Russian occupation of Afghanistan. Al-Qaida, literally "the database", was originally the computer file of the thousands of mujahideen who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians."
Cook's analysis is dead on in certain respects, but, like others, including author Chalmers Johnson (RIP), he made the mistake of contextualizing terrorism against the West as the result of a blowback against American foreign policy that is orchestrated chiefly by a mad and independent Osama Bin Laden and his hardcore followers. In reality, the problem of terrorism originates directly from within Western governments, mainly the United States, England, and Israel - governments that are not democratic, but authoritarian, and rely on secrecy, misinformation, and deception to promote policies that enrich a few well-connected individuals who are powerful and immoral enough to negatively influence government legislation and government policy.
#7. A BBC article from July 2004 called "Al-Qaeda's origins and links" reveals that Osama Bin Laden was a CIA agent in the 1980s. The article states: "During the anti-Soviet jihad Bin Laden and his fighters received American and Saudi funding. Some analysts believe Bin Laden himself had security training from the CIA." It is highly possible that Osama Bin Laden was still an agent of the CIA on September 11, 2001. As they say of the CIA, once a member, always a member.
#8. J. Michael Springmann, a 20 year foreign service official, and a former Consulate officer in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, has publicly stated for many years that the CIA brought over Muslim radicals to the United States for secret terrorist training. Most of these radicals were brought through Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, where Springman was stationed from 1987 to 1989 before he was let go by the State Department because he raised questions about the weakly enforced VISA qualification process.
In an interview with Alex Jones in May 2002 Springmann pointed out that 15 of the 19 hijackers in the 9/11 attacks entered the United States after CIA officials in Jeddah approved their visas. "According to the Los Angeles Times," said Springmann, "fifteen of the nineteen people, the Saudis who were allegedly responsible for flying planes into the World Trade Towers and the Pentagon, they got their visas from the Consulate at Jeddah."
In an article written in February of 2003 called "Policing the Borders: Old Fears, New Realities" Springmann wrote about how U.S. foreign policy works, and to what ends:
"What very few Americans understand is the pathological Cold War mindset of those who have shaped U.S. foreign policy since the middle of the last century. It is a worldview with little interest in "security" per se. For those who exercise ultimate power, success is measured by the bottom lines on certain corporate quarterly reports. These numbers represent transcendent ends which have justified and continue to justify any and every means imaginable, from rubber-stamping illegitimate visa applications to full scale massacre."
Click here to read the transcript of Alex Jones's interview with Springmann in May 2002; click here to listen to Alex Jones's interview with Springmann in February 2010. Both interviews are very revealing, and should be required listening/reading for everyone.
#9. Germany's Der Spiegel's published an article by Siegesmund von Ilsemann called "Arming the Middle East: The Checkered History of American Weapons Deals" in June 2007. The article backed up the reporting done by the BBC, and elsewhere that the United States government "supplied Afghan freedom fighters in the 1980s with money and arms for their struggle against occupying Soviet troops. One of the best customers for the CIA back then was Saudi millionaire Osama Bin Laden." This account is only half-true. The CIA funded and trained a network of Muslim fighters not to liberate Afghanistan from corrupt Soviet influence, but to create havoc and instigate a Soviet invasion so that it would drain itself of blood and treasure. Once the objective of bringing down the Soviet Union was achieved, the stage was set for the United States and the West to invade Afghanistan and take advantage of the country's vast resources, from oil to heroin.
#10. Selig Harrison, a current member of the Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars, a former senior associate of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, and an expert on South Asia, said in March 2001 at a conference called "Terrorism and Regional Security: Managing the Challenges in Asia," that the CIA and Pakistan's ISI helped create the backward and tyrannical Taliban. "The CIA made a historic mistake in encouraging Islamic groups from all over the world to come to Afghanistan," said Harrison, a quote that appears in an article in the Times of India from March 2001. According to Harrison, without the CIA and ISI's funds and guns, the Taliban wouldn't exist as a political and religious force in Afghanistan. An excerpt from the Times of India article:
The old associations between the intelligence agencies continue, Harrison said. "The CIA still has close links with the ISI (Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence)."
Today that money and those weapons have helped build up the Taliban, Harrison said. "The Taliban are not just recruits from 'madrassas' (Muslim theological schools) but are on the payroll of the ISI (Inter Services Intelligence, the intelligence wing of the Pakistani government)." The Taliban are now "making a living out of terrorism."
Harrison said the UN Security Council resolution number 1333 calls for an embargo on arms to the Taliban. "But it is a resolution without teeth because it does not provide sanctions for non-compliance," he said. "The US is not backing the Russians who want to give more teeth to the resolution."
Now it is Pakistan that "holds the key to the future of Afghanistan," Harrison said. The creation of the Taliban was central to Pakistan's "pan-Islamic vision," Harrison said.
It came after "the CIA made the historic mistake of encouraging Islamic groups from all over the world to come to Afghanistan," he said. The creation of the Taliban had been "actively encouraged by the ISI and the CIA," he said. "Pakistan has been building up Afghan collaborators who will sustain Pakistan," he said.
#11. The September 11, 2001 attacks, which serve as the basis for America's wars in the Middle East, were committed by the United States government with assistance from the government of Israel. This is an indisputable fact. Here is a list of three points that proves without a shadow of a doubt that the official 9/11 story is false, and indefensible:
* American physicist Steven E. Jones, Danish chemist Niels Harrit, and others wrote a peer-reviewed paper in 2009 called "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe," that was published in The Open Chemical Physics Journal. The authors discovered nano-thermite in samples of the WTC dust, a highly advanced explosive that is made by a small number of companies. They wrote:
"As measured using DSC, the material ignites and reacts vigorously at a temperature of approximately 430 °C, with a rather narrow exotherm, matching fairly closely an independent observation on a known super-thermite sample. The low temperature of ignition and the presence of iron oxide grains less than 120 nm show that the material is not conventional thermite (which ignites at temperatures above 900 °C) but very likely a form of super-thermite."
* The vertical collapse of Building Se7en, a building that was not struck by a plane. Steel buildings have never collapsed before because of fire alone. Common sense suggests that explosives were used to bring the building down, which rules out involvement by radical Muslims because officer workers would have noticed their activity in the building prior to 9/11.
* Firefighters said they witnessed and heard loud back-to-back explosions coming from the Towers. In this video clip, a couple of firefighters recount what they saw. One of them says, "It was as if they had detonated. . . as if they were planning to take down a building: boom boom boom boom boom."
There are so many more points, and so many more smoking guns, but it does not get any more obvious, any more in-your-face than hearing firefighters say that they heard bombs going off. All honest individuals must rethink their position on the 9/11 attacks after taking a look at the collapse of building 7, and watching firefighters say that they heard explosions. You don't have to be an expert to see the obvious. You don't even have to be smart. You just have to be honest and unafraid.
IV. Ending The Perpetual War on Terror And The Not So Great Game
Now that we know the threat from Al-Qaeda is not real, we must pressure our Western governments to end the global war on terrorism, and bring home all the troops from Afghanistan, Iraq, and everywhere else in the Middle East. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are unjust, unnecessary, and destructive to global peace, global harmony, and global stability. The U.S. and UK governments are not waging war in Iraq and Afghanistan to establish free and open democracies but to fulfill criminal goals, and emerge victorious in the 21st century's "Great Game."
The West's war on terror is all about the Great Game, not defeating "Al-Qaeda" or Islamic extremists. A small proof that this is true comes from Prince Andrew's own words. In one of the diplomatic cables published by WikiLeaks, Andrew says:
Addressing the Ambassador directly, Prince Andrew then turned to regional politics. He stated baldly that “the United Kingdom, Western Europe (and by extension you Americans too”) were now back in the thick of playing the Great Game. More animated than ever, he stated cockily: “And this time we aim to win!”
Such arrogance reflects anti-human and anti-freedom beliefs, which are shared by many members of the elite in the United States, England, and Europe, who desire war and conflict over peace and brotherhood. Members of the Western political elite have the hearts of monsters. They are more interested in winning a geopolitical game that causes death and mass destruction than in uplifting humanity, and making the world a better place for all people.
U.S. and U.K. policymakers cynically fund and assist radical Muslims, and sometimes stage terrorist attacks that are blamed on radical Muslims, to maintain the public perception in the Western world that there are thousands of nasty terrorists who wish them harm. But this is not true. And it is a dangerous perception that must be erased. As Professor Michel Chossudovsky writes in his 2008 article "Al Qaeda and the "War on Terrorism":
"U.S. foreign policy is not geared towards curbing the tide of Islamic fundamentalism. In fact, it is quite the opposite. The significant development of "radical Islam", in the wake of the Cold War in the former Soviet Union and the Middle East is consistent with Washington’s hidden agenda. The latter consists in sustaining rather than combating international terrorism, with a view to destabilizing national societies and preventing the articulation of genuine secular social movements directed against the American Empire.
Washington continues to support — through CIA covert operations — the development of Islamic fundamentalism, throughout the Middle East, in the former Soviet Union as well in China and India.
Throughout the developing world, the growth of sectarian, fundamentalist and other such organizations tends to serve U.S. interests. These various organizations and armed insurgents have been developed, particularly in countries where state institutions have collapsed under the brunt of the IMF-sponsored economic reforms.
These fundamentalist organizations contribute by destroying and displacing secular institutions.
Islamic fundamentalism creates social and ethnic divisions. It undermines the capacity of people to organize against the American Empire. These organizations or movements, such as the Taliban, often foment "opposition to Uncle Sam" in a way which does not constitute any real threat to America’s broader geopolitical and economic interests."
We must speak the full truth about the origins of the war on terror if we want to end it. Journalists need to publicize the historical facts about U.S. support for terrorism, and report the truth about the September 11, 2001 attacks. We can't let the truth about government-staged terrorism be trapped in the black hole of history. There will be change once we speak the full truth passionately and demand justice. The old tyrants will vanish under a new sun.
A different world is possible. A world with universal and permanent peace on Earth is not a Utopian dream. There are no reasons for conflict in the world today. The threat of "terrorism" is a manufactured threat. Al-Qaeda doesn't exist. And 9/11 is a big lie. In sum, the War on Terror is totally illegitimate and criminal. The governments of United States, England, Canada, Australia, and Israel represent the only obstacle to peace in the Middle East. Their leaders have committed crimes against humanity, and must be brought to justice.
"A war on world poverty may well do more for the security of the west than a war on terror," said U.K. MP Robin Cook in 2005. He was right, and then some. But it is not enough to be right. We must win. We must put an end to the War on Terror and the Great Game. We must restart the global anti-war movement, and this time we must expose the lie about 9/11 because victory against the war criminals is impossible without a firm foothold on the ground of truth.
By Saman Mohammadi
The Excavator
December 8, 2010
.
i said talk to their boss
you allways were..your own boss
[its you..that make your life choices]
yes..thats a good saying
i wish i could channle the justice spirits..as dream on suggests
but i just been channeling them ..for my courtcase/appeal..
as usual..all they do is quote previous...judgments
then accord an application..[not made]..for costs to the prostituter
they call the judge issueing two orders on the same charge...as an accident..by book keepers...and...blah..blah..blah..
imm over it...its a rigged game
unless they go for costs
that..will energize me to go to the higher courts
so im hoping they get greedy..for now im just over..the farce that passes as justice..its a grand scam...where they repeat yesterdays mistakes..unthinkingly...thus dont need to think today..
good suggestion..to not be giving
heart and soul to faulse hope...justice is blind it cant see hope
buty it can smell fear...other than that..its like the 3 monk-keys..a system to protect their own..to serve the master..and his corperations
but i need to love them all the same
they have taught me so much about human fear
they fear the poor so much..they really think they need police-us into early graves...but from there we got eternity..to obesss them back..or move on..with the higher things...that are much more important
manny allready is gaining many clues
as to what..these important things..really are
satan didnt do the evil
we did...or rather it is blamed on US..[c-i-a]..eh!
[there is a joinder..[con-junction]..
of evil in-fluences..[of hell..with evil-minds]
with..us needing to think evil...FIRST...our thought attract..those who will seek to destroy the earth
thats how ..simply
vile..is claiming its own
there is no opposite to god..[good]
just as real..has no opposite..[lie]..because good..is the only truth.
evil is a lie..thus not good..
thus not in the end..true*
its convoluted...but only good..[god]..is real.
Is there..any dispute on/its adherence..to belief
in the spiritual in-fluences..of good over evil?>>..yes
its inverted...
good..has no influence over evil
just as evil..can have no influence over true good
It is the reality of our life that expresses the very character
of who we are, our attitudes etc..that demonstrates our selfish.or our loving heart
dominant sin..grips them..as in..a vice,..and their chief thoughts..
run on the lines..it has marked out...in this..its previous material life...
Take the Officer, whose dominant vices..were hate and ruthlessness...He thought hate,..*that produced an atmosphere of cruelty..and hate,..and his
companions were likewise..doing/thinking..the same ideas.
The sum total of their united ideas
formed that division of Hell.
Thursday, January 6, 2011
11 Reasons Why The Threat From Al-Qaeda is Not Real
active links at
http://redactednews.blogspot.com/2011/01/11-reasons-why-threat-from-al-qaeda-is.html
Oh,a word of caution. Sometimes the most destructive thing can be to devote yourSelf Heart & Soul to a no win situation. Right or wrong often doesn't come into it you know? Only the prevailing law and the evidence that has been collected to substantiate a charge in regards to an alleged breach of same.
you would be wise to consider that in relation to what you know and how you choose to proceed.
Be aware that your current conduct has the potential to influence proceedings one way or the other, as everything relevant up to the day of judgment may be considered, if that is relevant to your circumstances, not just what has already transpired.
..
The United States government has repeatedly stated that the treat from Al-Qaeda against America is very real, and that all action is being taken to eliminate that threat. Nobody in their right mind would question such a serious assessment about a sensitive national security matter from the world's leading democracy. But the truth is that over the past fifty years America's democratic institutions like the press have been weakened, and an elitist National Security State has risen, and taken control over all aspects of government.
Since World War II U.S. leaders have consistently lied to the American people about foreign threats in order to feed the military machine's appetite for war. All of these wars are unjust and unwarranted but that does not stop the self-interested criminals who control U.S. foreign policy. A recent example of a lie they told was their assertion that Saddam Hussein was in possession of weapons of mass destruction. That episode revealed to many people the true nature of the American government. Simply put, it does not care about the truth, or the American people, or the members of the military. U.S. leaders like former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, and current Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, to name but a few, tell lies at will. Dishonesty means nothing to them. They deceive the American people, the American military, and the world about their motives and methods - and they lie to themselves about their own powers and abilities.
Next to the hundreds of thousands of innocent people who were slaughtered by the American war machine in its numerous criminal wars, U.S. soldiers have suffered the most - way more than the rest of the population in America. It can't be said enough that the U.S. government's treatment of its soldiers is scandalous and shameful.
..It is so out of whack that in America today dogs are treated better than military vets. Some dogs are even treated to luxurious spas while military vets are denied the proper health care that they deserve. Instead, they're left to rot, and commit suicide. And for what? To defend America? To defeat Al-Qaeda? Or to keep the war machine and its benefactors rich and powerful? As you will see by the end of this post, it is the latter.
I. Setting The Historical Scene: The United States Government And The American Mainstream Media Are Anti-Democracy, Anti-Freedom, Anti-Peace
"All governments lie." said American journalist I. F. Stone. You can add to that great quote "and all newspapers lie, too."
By joining forces together, the CIA and American newspapers sold two criminal wars to the people - a manufactured and destructive "War on Terror," and the Iraq war. Most journalists were not consciously part of the propaganda campaign, they just bought the hype, but, without a doubt, a lot of journalists who work for the CIA knowingly injected false information into their columns and helped spread nationalist fever across America to boost public support for the wars.
Government spies posing as independent journalists is one of the CIA's least kept secrets. Former CIA director William Colby famously said "The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." Carl Bernstein revealed the relationship between the CIA and the media in his 1977 Rolling Stone article "The CIA and the Media." An excerpt:
"Some of these journalists' relationships with the Agency were tacit; some were explicit. There was cooperation, accommodation and overlap. Journalists provided a full range of clandestine services -- from simple intelligence gathering to serving as go-betweens with spies in Communist countries. Reporters shared their notebooks with the CIA. Editors shared their staffs. Some of the journalists were Pulitzer Prize winners, distinguished reporters who considered themselves ambassadors-without-portfolio for their country. Most were less exalted: foreign correspondents who found that their association with the Agency helped their work; stringers and freelancers who were as interested it the derring-do of the spy business as in filing articles, and, the smallest category, full-time CIA employees masquerading as journalists abroad. In many instances, CIA documents show, journalists were engaged to perform tasks for the CIA with the consent of the managements America's leading news organizations."
The media's relationship with the CIA began well before the Vietnam war, but it was after that disastrous war ended when the Pentagon and the CIA took their clandestine media operations to another level. They wanted to completely gut the free press in America, which contributed to the anti-war sentiment in the late 60s and early 70s. Government officials secretly established deep ties to journalists to make sure that the American people would be less informed about America's foreign policy, and future conflicts, and hence, less combative against the government and less anti-war.
The Pentagon has been interested in information warfare for many decades, and the fruits of their studies are applied to the American people, and to foreign enemies. "PSYOP," shorthand for "Psychological Operations," is a propaganda and disinformation Pentagon program that is used in the foreign battlefield to break the will of enemy forces, and make the ensuing battle a little less bloody. It worked wonderfully in the Gulf war. Retired Col. Jim Noll said that PSYOPs was a life-saving military technique. From a 2001 article called "Persian Gulf War 10 years later: Winning the war by convincing the enemy to go home" by Al Zdon:
"The psychological warfare in the end saved many lives, on both sides. "I know many American lives were saved because so many Iraqis had deserted or chose not to fight when we arrived. Many of them were holding up our leaflets to surrender with."
The leaflets were based on the intelligence the Psyops battalion had gained from prisoners. Some showed large bombers dropping their payloads. Others showed tank units how to surrender. Others showed Americans landing from the sea (a military ploy to divert Iraqi defenses. The U.S. never did land from the sea.) Others were printed on fake Iraqi money so the soldiers could conceal them in their wallets."
Wired magazine reported in June that the Pentagon may change the name PSYOP to Military Information Support and/to Operations (MISO). I wrote an article about the proposed name change back in July called "MISO: Making Intelligence Sound Obscure."
The threat by PSYOPS to democracy, and freedom in America cannot be overstated. It is a fact that the Pentagon and the CIA routinely use PSYOPS against the American people to make them support illegal and unnecessary wars. Indeed, it is not a stretch to say that today the United States is a PSYOPS state, not a democratic state.
It should concern all Americans, and all citizens around the world that the CIA and Pentagon are using psychological military techniques inside the United States against the American people. The CIA was created to keep tabs on foreign enemies, not the American people. Former Governor Jesse Ventura has confirmed that the CIA is working within America's borders a number of times in his many television interviews. He says that a cadre of CIA officials questioned him shortly after he won the election in Minnesota as an independent candidate about how he won. Ventura guesses that the CIA questioned him because they were surprised that a political maverick like him succeeded and wanted to know his political strategy in order to prevent a similar candidate from advancing to such a high political position in the future.
Former President Harry Truman criticized the CIA for intervening in domestic affairs in a Washington Post op-ed in 1963: "For some time I have been disturbed by the way the CIA has been diverted from its original assignment. It has become an operational and at times a policy-making arm of the government.... I never had any thought that when I set up the CIA that it would be injected into peacetime cloak and dagger operations."
Philip Agee, who served in the CIA from 1957 to 1968, left the Agency because it failed to uphold the beliefs and values of the American people. He remained a leading critic of CIA policies until his death on January 7, 2008. In his 1975 book "Inside the Company: CIA Diary," Agee warned that the murderous methods used by the CIA and the American empire in foreign lands would be used against the American people. "The killings at Kent State and Jackson State," he wrote, "show clearly enough that sooner or later our counter-insurgency methods would be applied at home." The rise of FEMA, TSA, and the overall police state proves that Agee's prediction was accurate. In fact, the threat of martial law is so severe that it can be declared by the White House in the very near future.
II. Flashback: The Threat From Iraq Was Not Real
Knowing the truth matters in a democracy because without the truth citizens can't make informed decisions about government policies that impact their lives. It is not possible to consciously answer fundamental societal questions like "should we go to war?" without a firm grasp of all the facts at hand. When independent journalists fail to provide the simple and straightforward facts to the public, they become complicit in government murder and fraud, and deserve even more ridicule than dishonest government officials and government-owned journalists.
Had the truth emerged that Saddam Hussein was not in possession of weapons of mass destruction before America invaded Iraq in March of 2003, there would not have been any public support for the war. True, hundreds of thousands of people around the world protested the invasion of Iraq before it was launched, but many people didn't because they believed the lie that Saddam was a dangerous threat and would use WMDs against America if he wasn't taken out. Leaders in the Bush administration used the oldest trick in the book of war to get the people to support a war that was not in their interest: they created a justification. Basically, they lied.
Since a government's justification for war, whether real or contrived, carries weight with a significant amount of people because they accept the word of authority over science and critical thinking, it is crucial to know, especially in societies based on the consent of the people, if a justification given by the government for war is true, or false. In the case of Iraq, as we now know, it was false.
It is a tragedy that the world did not learn the fact that Saddam did not have weapons of mass destruction a lot sooner. Hundreds of thousands of innocent people died in Iraq who could have lived a long and fulfilling life, and the country itself was destroyed in a deliberate and systematic fashion. Dirk Adriaensens, a member of the Executive Committee of the BRussells Tribunal, which is a group that was part of the World Tribunal on Iraq, describes exactly how Iraq was demolished by the sick and murderous U.S. and U.K. governments in his article "Iraq: The Age of Darkness."
Leaders in the Bush administration knew all along that Saddam did not have WMDs and was not a threat, but they wanted to go to war so bad that they made stuff up and presented it as the truth to the whole world. Ellen Knickmeyer, a former Washington Post bureau chief in Baghdad and Cairo, said this much and more in an article she wrote in October after WikiLeaks published hundreds of thousands of Iraq war logs. "Recent revelations by WikiLeaks," Knickmeyer said, "show how top American leaders lied, knowingly, to the American public, to American troops, and to the world."
Some defenders of the Iraq war insist that it was noble and good because a tyrant was removed from power. This is a poisonous and dangerous half-truth. Indeed, it is true that Saddam was a vicious tyrant, and a godforsaken man, but his removal from power didn't require a huge ground invasion and subsequent military occupation since he had no real support from his people and military. But that's beside the point because removing tyrants from power is not an objective of U.S. foreign policy. And it should not be. Tyrants are always removed from below, never from above.
If American leaders truly cared about the rule of law and democracy in Iraq they would have presented their case to the United Nations that Saddam was a war criminal for gassing the Kurds, which would have been met with agreement, and from there a variety of peaceful and legal means would have been recommended by the international community to bring Saddam to justice. If he then resisted international arrest, there would be a legal justification for using force to capture him and bring him to trial. But that course was not taken by American leaders because justice was only on their lips, not on their minds. American leaders and the CIA, unfortunately, are destroyers - not defenders - of democracy and the rule of a law. The same is true for Israeli leaders and Mossad. They are counterfeiters and war criminals who deserve to be hanged, not defended and praised.
Noam Chomsky said on Democracy Now last week that the political leadership in both the United States and Israel share a "profound hatred for democracy." This statement gets at the truth of the current political reality in Washington and Tel Aviv, but U.S. and Israeli don't just hate democracy, they also hate the American people, humanity, truth, honor, peace, and all that is good and righteous in the world.
Just as Iraq was destroyed by design by U.S. leaders, America is being destroyed by design by U.S. leaders. The American people are coming to this realization reluctantly, but they're coming to it at last. They are beginning to discover that their country is in ruins not by accident but from other causes, namely, that their top leaders are traitors who desire the destruction of America and the advancement of a new world order in which their illegally acquired power and wealth grows evermore.
Both Herodotus and Socrates said "The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance." Knowledge of the cause for war brings good into the world, ignorance of the causes of war brings evil into the world. Despite what we have been taught, war is not natural. Wars occur because it is profitable for ruling elites. Orwell relayed this truth to the people before the Second World War began, and when it ended, after millions of people died, historian Howard Zinn taught it to people for decades, up to the start of the Iraq war. In 2006 he wrote, "war itself is the enemy of the human race."
To defeat war, humanity's collective enemy, we must learn the truth for why there is war in our time. When asked why America is at war American leaders always point to the attacks on September 11, 2001, but the official account of what happened on that day is not true. New scientific evidence gathered by a collection of physicists, scientists, architects, and engineers, among them Steven E. Jones, Niels Harrit, and Richard Gage, proves unequivocally that the towers, including the rarely mentioned building 7, collapsed due to controlled demolition using explosives.
American leaders told one of the greatest lies in human history when they said that Al-Qaeda was responsible for the 9/11 attacks. That lie spawned an immediate and criminal invasion of Afghanistan, and a much larger, and more consequential global war on terrorism that is still being waged in numerous countries more than nine years after the attacks. Former President George W. Bush also used the 9/11 lie to paint Saddam Hussein as a supporter of terrorism. In his State of the Union Address on January 28, 2003,Bush said: "Evidence from intelligence sources, secret communications and statements by people now in custody reveal that Saddam Hussein aids and protects terrorists, including members of Al Qaida." This statement later was proven to be a complete lie. Saddam had no connections to Al-Qaeda.
President Barack Obama has frequently relied on the 9/11 lie to support his administration's war in Afghanistan. After the Christmas Day airliner bombing attempt last December, which also remains a dubious event because the bomber was boarded onto the plane with help from an unmentioned person who is presumed to be an intelligence official, Obama said: "We are at war against al Qaeda, a far-reaching network of violence and hatred that attacked us on 9/11, that killed nearly 3,000 innocent people and that is plotting to strike us again. And we will do whatever it takes to defeat them."
Obama was blatantly lying when he said that Al-Qaeda is a "far-reaching network of violence and hatred." Once you research the origins of Al-Qaeda, which in Arabic simply means "the base," you can't help but view American leaders like Bush and Obama as devilish tricksters who are trying to pull the wool over our eyes.
III. 11 Reasons Why The Threat From Al-Qaeda is Not Real
Al-Qaeda is either one of these things, or it is a combination of them: a) a completely fake threat; the organization does not exist, b) an organization that exists in small numbers but was created by the CIA to serve a corrupt U.S. foreign policy, and remains a U.S. intelligence asset in the manufactured global war on terrorism, or c) a small organization that exists independently of the U.S. government but its strength and influence in the Middle East is exaggerated by radical policymakers and officials in Washington. Out of all three statements the first and second deserve the most serious attention because they are supported by the evidence listed below.
#1. Radical American cleric Anwar Al-Awlaki, who was ordered to be assassinated by President Obama, met with top military officials at the Pentagon months after the 9/11 attacks. Were Pentagon officials sincerely interested in reaching out to members of the Muslim community, or were they recruiting radical Muslim clerics to spread the message of radical Islam in order to validate and sustain the Bush administration's war on terror? It is not outrageous or crazy to raise the question if the U.S. government aims to inflame radical Islam, even by funding and supporting undercover intelligence agents that front as terrorists, in order to make the American people perceive that they are in danger of violent Islamic extremism, and cause them to give up their liberties for permanent security.
An alarming piece of news is that follows an undeniable pattern of government-induced terrorist activity is of an FBI informant, Craig Monteilh, who infiltrated a Mosque in California, and shouted violent rhetoric with the intention to entrap potential terrorists, and then sell it to the public that "Hey, the FBI arrested someone at a Mosque who wanted to blow a building up," without mentioning the fact that the FBI agent was the one who got the ball rolling in the first place. In this case, however, the government's plan to attract and create terrorists didn't work. The Washington Post reported: "In the Irvine case, Monteilh's mission as an informant backfired. Muslims were so alarmed by his talk of violent jihad that they obtained a restraining order against him."
#2. CIA Director Leon Panetta revealed in June 2010 on ABC's This Week that there are less than 100 Al-Qaeda members in the Afghanistan-Pakistan region. "I think the estimate on the number of Al Qaeda," said Panetta, "is actually relatively small. At most, we're looking at 50 to 100, maybe less. It's in that vicinity." By contrast, there are more than 100,000 American soldiers and military contractors in the region. You can't call it a fair fight. You can't even say "it's not a fair fight," because, in reality, it is not a fight at all. It is not a fight. 50,000 Al-Qaeda members would make it a fight. It still wouldn't be a fair fight, but it would be a fight.
#3. The International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), one of the world's leading security think tanks, published a report this year which said that the threat of Al-Qaeda and the Taliban is exaggerated by Western policymakers. The report warned that the war in Afghanistan will become a "long, drawn-out disaster" if troops are not withdrawn. Nigel Inkster, a former deputy chief of Britain's Secret Intelligence Service who is a member of the think tank, also said that the threat from Al-Qaeda in Pakistan is minimal, and almost absent in Yemen, and Somalia.
Commenting on the report by the IISS, journalist and author Eric Margolis said:
"The IISS’s findings are a direct challenge to Obama, Britain’s new prime minister, David Cameron, and other US allies with troops in Afghanistan. This report undermines their rational used to sustain the increasingly unpopular conflict. It will certainly convince sceptics that the real reason for occupation of Afghanistan has to do with oil, excluding China from the region, and keeping watch on nuclear-armed Pakistan."
#4. Former US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said in an interview to the Los Angeles Times's Patt Morrison in October 2010 that Al-Qaeda doesn't exist. "The organization that did 9/11 — that Al Qaeda — I don't think really exists," said Rice. The statement is shocking, to say the least, and contradicts the official 9/11 story which is built on the premise that Al-Qaeda, regarded as an Islamic terrorist group by the United States, England, Canada, Israel, Saudi Arabia and many other governments, was large and sophisticated enough to plan and execute the biggest terrorist attack in the United States. Apparently, Rice doesn't agree with President Obama that Al-Qaeda is a "far-reaching network of violence."
#5. The U.S. government created, and funded Islamic fundamentalism in the 1980s to be used to draw the Soviet Union into Afghanistan, and bleed it to death in a costly and unwinnable war. This was no doubt a smart move when you have a strategic hat on, when you are sitting comfortably on the seat of power, but when you are confronting issues of peace and war, life and death, coexistence and annihilation, on a very small planet, it was a very cynical and dangerous error. Zbigniew Brzezinski, who is considered a realist in foreign policy circles and a critic of Israel, was one of the leaders behind the operation as President Jimmy Carter's National Security Advisor. In an interview he gave to a weekly French magazine called "Le Nouvel Observateur" in January 1998 he discussed how and why the U.S. funded Muslim terrorists (or freedom fighters, depending on your outlook). Excerpt from the interview:
Q: When the Soviets justified their intervention by asserting that they intended to fight against a secret involvement of the United States in Afghanistan, people didn't believe them. However, there was a basis of truth. You don't regret anything today?
Brzezinski: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter. We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam War. Indeed, for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war unsupportable by the government, a conflict that brought about the demoralization and finally the break-up of the Soviet empire.
The fact that America trained and funded a terrorist network in Central Asia less than two decades before the September 11, 2001 attacks is a relevant historical fact. It raises the strong possibility that after the Soviet Union collapsed the CIA used their terrorist network to promote U.S. foreign policy by covert means, including in the United States on September 11, 2001.
#6. Robin Cook, who served as a British MP for 22 years and as Foreign Secretary from 1997 to 2001, wrote an article for the Guardian in July 2005, a month before his death, called "The struggle against terrorism cannot be won by military means." Throughout the article Cook makes many devastating critiques of the West's war on terror, but here is a quote that requires our greatest attention:
"Bin Laden was, though, a product of a monumental miscalculation by western security agencies. Throughout the 80s he was armed by the CIA and funded by the Saudis to wage jihad against the Russian occupation of Afghanistan. Al-Qaida, literally "the database", was originally the computer file of the thousands of mujahideen who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians."
Cook's analysis is dead on in certain respects, but, like others, including author Chalmers Johnson (RIP), he made the mistake of contextualizing terrorism against the West as the result of a blowback against American foreign policy that is orchestrated chiefly by a mad and independent Osama Bin Laden and his hardcore followers. In reality, the problem of terrorism originates directly from within Western governments, mainly the United States, England, and Israel - governments that are not democratic, but authoritarian, and rely on secrecy, misinformation, and deception to promote policies that enrich a few well-connected individuals who are powerful and immoral enough to negatively influence government legislation and government policy.
#7. A BBC article from July 2004 called "Al-Qaeda's origins and links" reveals that Osama Bin Laden was a CIA agent in the 1980s. The article states: "During the anti-Soviet jihad Bin Laden and his fighters received American and Saudi funding. Some analysts believe Bin Laden himself had security training from the CIA." It is highly possible that Osama Bin Laden was still an agent of the CIA on September 11, 2001. As they say of the CIA, once a member, always a member.
#8. J. Michael Springmann, a 20 year foreign service official, and a former Consulate officer in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, has publicly stated for many years that the CIA brought over Muslim radicals to the United States for secret terrorist training. Most of these radicals were brought through Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, where Springman was stationed from 1987 to 1989 before he was let go by the State Department because he raised questions about the weakly enforced VISA qualification process.
In an interview with Alex Jones in May 2002 Springmann pointed out that 15 of the 19 hijackers in the 9/11 attacks entered the United States after CIA officials in Jeddah approved their visas. "According to the Los Angeles Times," said Springmann, "fifteen of the nineteen people, the Saudis who were allegedly responsible for flying planes into the World Trade Towers and the Pentagon, they got their visas from the Consulate at Jeddah."
In an article written in February of 2003 called "Policing the Borders: Old Fears, New Realities" Springmann wrote about how U.S. foreign policy works, and to what ends:
"What very few Americans understand is the pathological Cold War mindset of those who have shaped U.S. foreign policy since the middle of the last century. It is a worldview with little interest in "security" per se. For those who exercise ultimate power, success is measured by the bottom lines on certain corporate quarterly reports. These numbers represent transcendent ends which have justified and continue to justify any and every means imaginable, from rubber-stamping illegitimate visa applications to full scale massacre."
Click here to read the transcript of Alex Jones's interview with Springmann in May 2002; click here to listen to Alex Jones's interview with Springmann in February 2010. Both interviews are very revealing, and should be required listening/reading for everyone.
#9. Germany's Der Spiegel's published an article by Siegesmund von Ilsemann called "Arming the Middle East: The Checkered History of American Weapons Deals" in June 2007. The article backed up the reporting done by the BBC, and elsewhere that the United States government "supplied Afghan freedom fighters in the 1980s with money and arms for their struggle against occupying Soviet troops. One of the best customers for the CIA back then was Saudi millionaire Osama Bin Laden." This account is only half-true. The CIA funded and trained a network of Muslim fighters not to liberate Afghanistan from corrupt Soviet influence, but to create havoc and instigate a Soviet invasion so that it would drain itself of blood and treasure. Once the objective of bringing down the Soviet Union was achieved, the stage was set for the United States and the West to invade Afghanistan and take advantage of the country's vast resources, from oil to heroin.
#10. Selig Harrison, a current member of the Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars, a former senior associate of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, and an expert on South Asia, said in March 2001 at a conference called "Terrorism and Regional Security: Managing the Challenges in Asia," that the CIA and Pakistan's ISI helped create the backward and tyrannical Taliban. "The CIA made a historic mistake in encouraging Islamic groups from all over the world to come to Afghanistan," said Harrison, a quote that appears in an article in the Times of India from March 2001. According to Harrison, without the CIA and ISI's funds and guns, the Taliban wouldn't exist as a political and religious force in Afghanistan. An excerpt from the Times of India article:
The old associations between the intelligence agencies continue, Harrison said. "The CIA still has close links with the ISI (Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence)."
Today that money and those weapons have helped build up the Taliban, Harrison said. "The Taliban are not just recruits from 'madrassas' (Muslim theological schools) but are on the payroll of the ISI (Inter Services Intelligence, the intelligence wing of the Pakistani government)." The Taliban are now "making a living out of terrorism."
Harrison said the UN Security Council resolution number 1333 calls for an embargo on arms to the Taliban. "But it is a resolution without teeth because it does not provide sanctions for non-compliance," he said. "The US is not backing the Russians who want to give more teeth to the resolution."
Now it is Pakistan that "holds the key to the future of Afghanistan," Harrison said. The creation of the Taliban was central to Pakistan's "pan-Islamic vision," Harrison said.
It came after "the CIA made the historic mistake of encouraging Islamic groups from all over the world to come to Afghanistan," he said. The creation of the Taliban had been "actively encouraged by the ISI and the CIA," he said. "Pakistan has been building up Afghan collaborators who will sustain Pakistan," he said.
#11. The September 11, 2001 attacks, which serve as the basis for America's wars in the Middle East, were committed by the United States government with assistance from the government of Israel. This is an indisputable fact. Here is a list of three points that proves without a shadow of a doubt that the official 9/11 story is false, and indefensible:
* American physicist Steven E. Jones, Danish chemist Niels Harrit, and others wrote a peer-reviewed paper in 2009 called "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe," that was published in The Open Chemical Physics Journal. The authors discovered nano-thermite in samples of the WTC dust, a highly advanced explosive that is made by a small number of companies. They wrote:
"As measured using DSC, the material ignites and reacts vigorously at a temperature of approximately 430 °C, with a rather narrow exotherm, matching fairly closely an independent observation on a known super-thermite sample. The low temperature of ignition and the presence of iron oxide grains less than 120 nm show that the material is not conventional thermite (which ignites at temperatures above 900 °C) but very likely a form of super-thermite."
* The vertical collapse of Building Se7en, a building that was not struck by a plane. Steel buildings have never collapsed before because of fire alone. Common sense suggests that explosives were used to bring the building down, which rules out involvement by radical Muslims because officer workers would have noticed their activity in the building prior to 9/11.
* Firefighters said they witnessed and heard loud back-to-back explosions coming from the Towers. In this video clip, a couple of firefighters recount what they saw. One of them says, "It was as if they had detonated. . . as if they were planning to take down a building: boom boom boom boom boom."
There are so many more points, and so many more smoking guns, but it does not get any more obvious, any more in-your-face than hearing firefighters say that they heard bombs going off. All honest individuals must rethink their position on the 9/11 attacks after taking a look at the collapse of building 7, and watching firefighters say that they heard explosions. You don't have to be an expert to see the obvious. You don't even have to be smart. You just have to be honest and unafraid.
IV. Ending The Perpetual War on Terror And The Not So Great Game
Now that we know the threat from Al-Qaeda is not real, we must pressure our Western governments to end the global war on terrorism, and bring home all the troops from Afghanistan, Iraq, and everywhere else in the Middle East. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are unjust, unnecessary, and destructive to global peace, global harmony, and global stability. The U.S. and UK governments are not waging war in Iraq and Afghanistan to establish free and open democracies but to fulfill criminal goals, and emerge victorious in the 21st century's "Great Game."
The West's war on terror is all about the Great Game, not defeating "Al-Qaeda" or Islamic extremists. A small proof that this is true comes from Prince Andrew's own words. In one of the diplomatic cables published by WikiLeaks, Andrew says:
Addressing the Ambassador directly, Prince Andrew then turned to regional politics. He stated baldly that “the United Kingdom, Western Europe (and by extension you Americans too”) were now back in the thick of playing the Great Game. More animated than ever, he stated cockily: “And this time we aim to win!”
Such arrogance reflects anti-human and anti-freedom beliefs, which are shared by many members of the elite in the United States, England, and Europe, who desire war and conflict over peace and brotherhood. Members of the Western political elite have the hearts of monsters. They are more interested in winning a geopolitical game that causes death and mass destruction than in uplifting humanity, and making the world a better place for all people.
U.S. and U.K. policymakers cynically fund and assist radical Muslims, and sometimes stage terrorist attacks that are blamed on radical Muslims, to maintain the public perception in the Western world that there are thousands of nasty terrorists who wish them harm. But this is not true. And it is a dangerous perception that must be erased. As Professor Michel Chossudovsky writes in his 2008 article "Al Qaeda and the "War on Terrorism":
"U.S. foreign policy is not geared towards curbing the tide of Islamic fundamentalism. In fact, it is quite the opposite. The significant development of "radical Islam", in the wake of the Cold War in the former Soviet Union and the Middle East is consistent with Washington’s hidden agenda. The latter consists in sustaining rather than combating international terrorism, with a view to destabilizing national societies and preventing the articulation of genuine secular social movements directed against the American Empire.
Washington continues to support — through CIA covert operations — the development of Islamic fundamentalism, throughout the Middle East, in the former Soviet Union as well in China and India.
Throughout the developing world, the growth of sectarian, fundamentalist and other such organizations tends to serve U.S. interests. These various organizations and armed insurgents have been developed, particularly in countries where state institutions have collapsed under the brunt of the IMF-sponsored economic reforms.
These fundamentalist organizations contribute by destroying and displacing secular institutions.
Islamic fundamentalism creates social and ethnic divisions. It undermines the capacity of people to organize against the American Empire. These organizations or movements, such as the Taliban, often foment "opposition to Uncle Sam" in a way which does not constitute any real threat to America’s broader geopolitical and economic interests."
We must speak the full truth about the origins of the war on terror if we want to end it. Journalists need to publicize the historical facts about U.S. support for terrorism, and report the truth about the September 11, 2001 attacks. We can't let the truth about government-staged terrorism be trapped in the black hole of history. There will be change once we speak the full truth passionately and demand justice. The old tyrants will vanish under a new sun.
A different world is possible. A world with universal and permanent peace on Earth is not a Utopian dream. There are no reasons for conflict in the world today. The threat of "terrorism" is a manufactured threat. Al-Qaeda doesn't exist. And 9/11 is a big lie. In sum, the War on Terror is totally illegitimate and criminal. The governments of United States, England, Canada, Australia, and Israel represent the only obstacle to peace in the Middle East. Their leaders have committed crimes against humanity, and must be brought to justice.
"A war on world poverty may well do more for the security of the west than a war on terror," said U.K. MP Robin Cook in 2005. He was right, and then some. But it is not enough to be right. We must win. We must put an end to the War on Terror and the Great Game. We must restart the global anti-war movement, and this time we must expose the lie about 9/11 because victory against the war criminals is impossible without a firm foothold on the ground of truth.
By Saman Mohammadi
The Excavator
December 8, 2010
.
i said talk to their boss
you allways were..your own boss
[its you..that make your life choices]
yes..thats a good saying
i wish i could channle the justice spirits..as dream on suggests
but i just been channeling them ..for my courtcase/appeal..
as usual..all they do is quote previous...judgments
then accord an application..[not made]..for costs to the prostituter
they call the judge issueing two orders on the same charge...as an accident..by book keepers...and...blah..blah..blah..
imm over it...its a rigged game
unless they go for costs
that..will energize me to go to the higher courts
so im hoping they get greedy..for now im just over..the farce that passes as justice..its a grand scam...where they repeat yesterdays mistakes..unthinkingly...thus dont need to think today..
good suggestion..to not be giving
heart and soul to faulse hope...justice is blind it cant see hope
buty it can smell fear...other than that..its like the 3 monk-keys..a system to protect their own..to serve the master..and his corperations
but i need to love them all the same
they have taught me so much about human fear
they fear the poor so much..they really think they need police-us into early graves...but from there we got eternity..to obesss them back..or move on..with the higher things...that are much more important
manny allready is gaining many clues
as to what..these important things..really are
Tuesday, January 4, 2011
welcome 2 opinion on line
this is a place for opinion
specificlly my opinion
naturally coments are appriciated*
but largely..this is just a place..to put stuff..up onto the web
stuff i find elsewhere...and cut and paste
into a new topic..[you can tell this stuff..from mine..because i dont use capitals/punctuation/etc]
i usually edit..much of the stuff i post..with my own opinion
later i will add in other blogs i have posted at..[mainly under the id of one under god]
but also johannine...and johan...and other titles...my intrests are two...god...and his creation..
i have rebuted the theory..of evolution
and other things people are so sure of..but with a childlike faith..that it is fact
when it clearly isnt...as im only too happy to point out..to those wanting to test my proofs
specificlly my opinion
naturally coments are appriciated*
but largely..this is just a place..to put stuff..up onto the web
stuff i find elsewhere...and cut and paste
into a new topic..[you can tell this stuff..from mine..because i dont use capitals/punctuation/etc]
i usually edit..much of the stuff i post..with my own opinion
later i will add in other blogs i have posted at..[mainly under the id of one under god]
but also johannine...and johan...and other titles...my intrests are two...god...and his creation..
i have rebuted the theory..of evolution
and other things people are so sure of..but with a childlike faith..that it is fact
when it clearly isnt...as im only too happy to point out..to those wanting to test my proofs
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)